Friday, August 29, 2008

Don't Blame the Messenger...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/29/navarrette.obamaspeech/index.html

He explained it as "the idea that we are responsible for ourselves, but that we also rise and fall as one nation" and described it as blending "individual responsibility and mutual responsibility." Simply put: You have to do what you can for yourself, but that you also have to do for others.

There is the rub: If everyone were to adhere to the first part, there will be no need for the second. Besides, even if we buy the idea that, as Obama said, "I am my brother's keeper, I am my sister's keeper," there is still the question of whether government should do the keeping.


That's an absurd thing to say. Not everyone can accomplish everything they need for themselves, no matter how hard they try. Suggesting that everyone living below the poverty line is just not trying hard enough is insulting. People take the jobs they can take and there are always going to be some jobs that just don't pay enough. If there wasn't some sort of safety net for these people, and for those who find themselves unable to work for whatever reason, a lot of people would starve through no fault of their own.

I'm also keen on people not playing the victim, not feeling a sense of entitlement, and not fearing competition. And when you're struggling in a tough economy, you don't give up or lay blame or ask for a government bailout, you work harder.

In a country where there isn't 100% employment, there's always going to be people who can't find work. That's not their fault and it's not because of a lack of effort. It's just the way things are. Unless you want those people to starve to death, you're always going to need a government sponsored safety net.

Case in point: On this third anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, there are people in New Orleans who are still waiting for the federal government to rebuild that city. Good luck with that, folks.

The waters have long since receded and residents are no longer standing on rooftops holding signs that read: "Help save us!" But they might as well be.


That wasn't the fault of government. That was the fault of the Bush Administration. I sometimes wonder if this has been Bush's intention all along: screw things up so much and so often that people lose all faith in government. In reality, the Bush Administrations failings shouldn't turn one off all government any more than a bad experience at a fast food restaurant should turn one off all restaurants.

The same goes for the Democrats who convened in Denver. This is a party that maintains power by trying to convince people that our country is a dark place, devoid of opportunities, and that the answer is to elect more of them.

It just so happens that this country becomes a dark place after years of Republican control. The fact that Carter, Clinton and Obama have run in the face of horrible Republican incompetence isn't their fault. You shouldn't kill the messenger.

Now they're seeking a change in the White House, a change in policy, and a change in national priorities --even if they aren't ready to change their tune.

What? Should they act like Joe Lieberman and just pretend the last 8 years didn't happen? This country is in the middle of a disaster the likes of which we haven't seen in decades.

Bad Idea...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/08/21/caylee.mom.bond.ap/index.html?iref=topnews


They should not have allowed her to leave jail at least until she gave up where the girl is. What leverage do they have now? She'll probably flee the state. She has been dishonest from the beginning and there's good evidence she killed the girl. Her family is being uncooperative, her mother almost certainly knows where the girl/body is and refuses to help. They should put her back in jail immediately and possibly have her mother join her. Only when they admit what happened should bail even be considered. If the little girl's father had killed her and lies about it does anyone believe he'd be anywhere other than a jail cell rotting away? The government should stop treating female offenders differently from male offenders.

Elitist...

http://www.nbc10.com/politics/17253759/detail.html

Now who's the elitist in this race? It's always been absurd that the media has allowed McCain to say this about Obama, this just illustrates the truth. McCain has always been the elitist. He doesn't care about gas prices, he doesn't care about the mortgage crisis. He gets his allowance from his wife and he's happy in his dozen homes. Meanwhile the rest of us are not so lucky.

Get Over Yourselves...

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/23/some-in-clinton-circle-outraged/

Hillary's supporters really need to get over this. They lost. Would Hillary have chosen Barack as her running mate? Would she have pursued his opinion on who she should choose? They're looking for reasons to hate Obama.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Please, Don't Make Him VP....

http://www.washingtonindependent.com/view/stop-obama-bayh-08

I hate to repeat myself but Obama would be making a HUGE mistake putting Evan Bayh anywhere on his ticket. Making him VP will pretty much doom his chances of winning the election. One would think the Dems would have learned their lesson when Gore placed Lieberman on his ticket and lost. This guy is the definition of a Washington insider. He's a pro-corporate DLCer and he's salivating over Iran the way he was salivating over Iraq 6 years ago.

You just hope that we haven't soured an entire generation on the necessity, from time to time, of using force because Iraq has been such a debacle.

Yes, it would be truly horrible if Americans actually learned the lesson of this war, that war is not to be a first choice and should only be entered into cautiously with a good plan for victory.

That would be tragic, because Iran is a grave threat.

The only people who are suggesting we go to war with Iran are neo-cons in America and Israelis who want to get rid of their regional rival on the cheap. Nobody with a brain is suggesting this. Besides, Bayh said the same thing about Iraq so his credibility is nil.

They're everything we thought Iraq was but wasn't.

Bayh is hoping the people of America will let him have his pet war with Iran, despite the fact that he was wrong about Iraq and is wrong about Iran. Why should we believe them now when they were so spectacularly, and intentionally, wrong last time? He knows Iran is not a threat to the US, just as he knew Iraq wasn't a threat, but his corporate paymasters need their money so he's out there again trying to get Americans killed so the CEO of Boeing can buy another yacht.

They are seeking nuclear weapons,

Fool us once shame on you...

they do support terrorists,

fool us twice shame on us.

they have threatened to destroy Israel,

They have a legitimate beef with Israel. They're not stupid enough to try anything against Israel. Even if they did, Israel is more than capable of defending itself. Why should we waste money and lives just so Israel can keep from getting its hands dirty?

and they've threatened us, too.

Bullshit. They can't do a goddamn thing to us. The worst they could do is launch a small attack against our troops in Iraq and if we'd get the hell out of there that wouldn't be a problem either.

Might Be Time to Cut Your Vacation Short...

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/presidentbush/2008/08/condi-tone-deaf.html

Wow, you'd think one of the foremost experts on Russia in the country, who happens to be Secretary of State, could drag herself away from her vacation long enough to address a huge crisis that happens to involve Russia.

Thanks so much, idiots...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/12/dem.ad/index.html

All you Clinton supporters, this is what you were voting for. The Clintons are a sad caricature of their former selves. The power was obviously way too much for them and they lost their minds. I think the Dems should be thanking their lucky stars Edwards and Clinton dropped out of this race. They would have been disasters in November. We'd be watching them implode right in front of us and dreading the elections.

Religion Kills...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,402004,00.html

Another case of someone dying for no other reason than their parents are crazy religious nutjobs. Someone should do something about this epidemic of religious violence.

Easy Question...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/08/11/bush.endangered.species.ap/index.html

Again, I'm simply shocked. Why would Bush weaken environmental regulations to benefit industry...oh right, he hates the environment and loves money.

No Justice In the Justice Dept...

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=5565214&page=1

What a surprise, a Bush Attorney General refusing to prosecute serious crimes committed by members of the administration. Perhaps this was something Congress should have foreseen back when they were confirming him instead of just taking his word that he'd enforce the law. After they were lied to twice by past AGs, they probably should have sought more proof than that.

For comparison, Janet Reno appointed a Special Prosecutor to investigate the President himself. That Special Prosecutor commenced years of pointless investigations against Clinton. We can't even get Bush's Attorney General to start investigations against ANYONE.

Clinton Surrogates Won't Go Away...

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5553013&page=1

Really, Howard? You're going to start pulling this shit now, huh? Ass.

You lost damnit, get over it. If these self-interested morons don't swallow their egos and get behind Obama they're going to be to blame for 4 more years of Bush.

You wouldn't have won even if Edwards did drop out before Iowa. I can't see Edwards' idealistic, change-oriented voters going for the Iron Lady Hillary. She's as anti-change as any candidate our side of the aisle.

Perhaps We Should Have Thought of This...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/08/09/georgia.ossetia/index.html

This is a sucky situation. Unfortunately, a not too small amount of the blame for all this can be placed directly at our feet. We started all this by allowing Kosovo to unilaterally declare independence from Serbia. We can hardly blame the Ossetians for declaring independence, or the Russians for providing them military support, when we did the same thing in Kosovo. It seems childish political oneupmanship (flipping off Russia by helping the Kosovars screw Russia's friend) is more important to the Bush Administration than human lives. I hope all those who will now die can forgive us for our brain dead foreign policy.

Self-Interested Lies...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,399041,00.html

Why does anybody believe a thing this guy says? It says in his bio who he is. That's all you need to know to know he's full of crap. He represents the "government in exile" of Iran. He's going to say whatever it takes to get the current regime out of power so he can get himself in power. If it means millions of his countrymen dead in an unnecessary war with the US or Israel, I guess that's acceptable to him. The guy's probably a spy for Israel. Seriously, he's the Ahmed Chalabi of Iran, making up any excuse to try to convince us to attack. Did this administration learn nothing from Iraq?

You Catch More Flies With Honey...

http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080807/NEWS01/80807030

PETA will never enjoy widespread support while it makes commercials like this. Comparing the brutal murder and butchering of an innocent man to the consumption of meat is absurd and only serves to make meat eaters less likely to support PETA's aims. Why should I support their efforts to ease the suffering of the animals raised for food when they continue to compare me to a brutal murderer?

Just Say No to Bayh...

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/08/obama-and-bayh.html

Man, I'm glad Obama didn't announce today that Bayh is his VP choice. I really hope we can dodge that bullet and that he'll announce a reasonable choice later.

Shut Up Already Bill...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/08/06/martin.billclinton/index.html

Bill Clinton needs to get over himself. He absurdly believed he'd always be the king of the Democrats no matter who succeeded him as President. Now that he's not that important, he's making a huge ass of himself. If he stops now, he may still be remembered well in Democratic circles. Otherwise, he's going to go down as another Jimmy Carter (even most Dems don't dare praise Carter for anything political).

BTW, what he said was racist. There's no way around it. The best thing he can do is stop mentioning it every chance he gets and hope people forget.

Going Too Far...

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/05/former-presidential-candidate-urges-crowd-to-stalk-federal-prosecutor/

Lovely. Just the behavior we expect from Presidential candidates. I fully agree that Al-Arian got a raw deal. He was caught up in the hysteria that suggests that all Palestinians are terrorists and must be sending money to Palestine to fight Israel. I still wouldn't be out there suggesting anybody attack a federal prosecutor. That's a good way to get thrown in jail.

Religious Freedom Goes Both Ways...

http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/tyson.asp

Somebody wanna explain to me why this is even an issue? More than half the employees at the plant are Muslim, so they naturally wanted a Muslim holiday off. Even though Christians are in the minority, they didn't even take a Christian holiday off the list, they took a secular holiday. They should have taken Christmas off the list. When Christians are in the majority in a workplace, Muslims get no paid religious holidays. It would be only fair if the reverse were also true. Either way, the union was given the choice of 8 holidays and they made a decision based on the wishes of their membership. This just proves that conservatives and Christians have a knee jerk reaction whenever they hear the word "Muslim" and completely lose their minds.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/207172.php

McCain can literally do anything he wants without the media even stopping to notice. It's sad the depths our once proud news media have sunk to.

Now if Obama had volunteered his wife for a questionable bikini pageant it'd be the story of the night.

A Philly News Fixture Passes...

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/obituaries/20080730_A_versatile__dogged__endearing_NBC10_face.html

I was surprised to see this news while perusing the Inquirer website. She seemed like a very nice person.

Bridge to Jail...

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=5472829&page=1

Now who's going to build bridges to nowhere?

Death Penalty...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/07/29/bali.appeal.ap/index.html

Now, I don't support the death penalty at all. I think it should be banned in all situations. That being said, I don't think the state should give any thought to the suffering of those they execute. These guys gave no thought to the suffering of their victims. If a state is going to execute people, maybe they should try to make it hurt more. Give them an idea what their victims went through.

Conservative Terrorism...

http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2008/07/in-tennessee-eliminationism-is-no.html

http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2008/jul/28/church-shooting-police-find-manifesto-suspects-car/

Now I wonder why a guy who reads books by Bill O'Reilly and Michael Weiner Savage would suddenly go off and murder a bunch of liberals. It's not like those two advocate murder of liberals...oh wait...they do. This kind of violent rhetoric is unfortunately all too common in conservative circles.

This bastard expected to die in a blaze of glory when the cops arrived. He didn't realize the people in the church were more than able to deal with his kind. He's going to wish he had died in that church. Somehow I don't think he's going to enjoy spending the rest of his miserable life in jail.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/07/29/shooting.witness/index.html

What jumps out at me is the bravery shown by the people there. Conservatives always claim liberals are cowards and yet these were some of the most liberal people there are. They showed a lot more bravery than most conservatives. I doubt Bill O'Reilly would have stood between a shooter and his children or family. He'd be the first under the table or out the door.

Friday, July 25, 2008

Hmm, Sounds Familiar...

http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/10015.html

Man this shit gets old. That whole Islamic boys having to kill another strikes me as not just absurd, but also impractical. If Islamic boys were actually running around killing other Islamic boys doesn't that eventually end up in a severe lack of boys? Then again, I think this crap makes a lot more sense if you turn off your brain. That seems to be the way most Republican/conservative things work.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/25/obama.troops/index.html

Yet another example of the White House using the power of the government to make Obama look bad. I have no doubt that McCain's campaign was in on this. The Pentagon has become a political arm of the Republican Party just like the Justice Dept. and all the others. There is no shame left in this Administration. Everything they do is for political reasons. First they tell him at the last minute that he can't come and then they criticize him for canceling at the last minute. I really hope people don't buy this crap like they've bought every other lie told by the McCain campaign and the Bush Administration.
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1826161,00.html

Gee, I wonder why the countries of the South America would run to Iran and Russia for alliances? Maybe if we didn't treat their people like children, and didn't try to kill their leaders when they elect people we don't like, they'd trust us and wouldn't need to beef up their militaries to keep safe.

Without War, What Would They Do For Fun?...

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1826310,00.html

They really want their war. They've been spoiled by our willingness to wage their wars for them. Up until now, Israel has been able to destroy its enemies with minimal personal risk. Now it seems they may have to go it alone if they decide to start another unnecessary war to increase the size of their empire in the Middle East.

Israeli officials have recognized that a U.S. air strike on Iranian nuclear sites is increasingly unlikely in the waning days of the Bush Administration.

Good, it would be disgusting to leave President Obama with another stupid war.

So dismayed were the Israelis by the latest U.S. moves, one military source told TIME, that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert wrote to Bush complaining that Israel should have been forewarned about the White House's abrupt change of course toward Iran.

Why should we tell them anything? They seem to think they run our country.

A top former officer from Mossad (the Israeli equivalent of the CIA) told TIME that Israel is mindful that an air strike on Iran would jolt the U.S. presidential election — probably rebounding badly on Republican contender Senator John McCain. Sources say that Israel sees a narrow "window of opportunity" for military action opening up between November and the swearing-in of the new American President next January. "No Israel leader wants to be blamed for destroying the Republican chances," says the former Mossad officer.

Yes, heaven forbid they hurt their buddies in the Republican Party. They know the only way they'll get their war in Iran without having to lift a finger and actually pay for it is if McCain wins. Instead they'll attack after the election, handing the new President a huge mess which he'll have to address. Perhaps the best course of action if this were to occur is to just step back, make it clear we had nothing to do with it, and let the bully get bitch slapped by Iran.

Whatever the real prospects for military action, in the game of rhetorical brinksmanship, Israel has matched every hotheaded statement from Ahmadinejad with threats of its own. The Israeli press often compares Iran's bellicose, Holocaust-denying leader to Hitler.

Please, they compare everyone they disagree with to Hitler. They compared Saddam Hussein to Hitler. They probably compare Obama to Hitler. You'd think people who actually suffered under Hitler would remember a bit about what he did. Let me know when Ahmadinejad starts killing millions of people, then perhaps you could compare him to Hitler. At least Hussein killed some people, still not nearly as many as Hitler. The ironic thing is that they get bent out of shape when anyone else makes light of Hitler and yet they do it themselves by comparing every tinpot dictator to him.

The danger remains in this high-stakes game of brinksmanship that either Israel or Iran could push the other too far. But the Bush Administration's sudden overture toward Iran, and its moves toward engaging it diplomatically in search of a solution to the nuclear impasse, make it more likely that Israel will follow Washington's lead rather than striking out on its own.

Never underestimate the overwhelming desire among the Israeli government, and the Bush Administration, for war. If they decide to forgo it it's not because they don't want war, it's because they decided they might actually pay a price for once.

Who Knew John Stossel Was Still Around...

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Stossel/story?id=5444494&page=1

Wow, I'm shocked, I'd have never thought John Stossel would come out in favor of discrimination. He is nothing but a corporate shill. There is nothing redeeming about that man. His only concern seems to be increased profits for his corporate paymasters. He claims to be a consumer advocate but again and again he takes the side of industry and actually hurts consumers by advocating extreme right-wing positions that benefit big business and hurt everyone else. The fact that ABC still identifies him as a consumer advocate, and not a right-wing pundit who is a paid advocate for industry, speaks volumes about the state of "news" in this country. Stossel is in no way shape or form a journalist and yet he's treated as one.

Roger Pilon, vice president of legal affairs for the libertarian Cato Institute, thinks that businesses just need to do what's best for them in order to stay afloat.

"People have to be free to run their own businesses because if they're not, they could find themselves going out of business in the blink of an eye," Pilon said.


Yeah, sure, pollute that river and kill thousands of people. After all, all that matters is the CEO's $100 million paycheck and the stockholders' huge dividend payment. To hell with all those who will suffer, if they wanted to live they should have been CEOs.

Why not the boss? It's the boss's money. Give me a break.

Evidently, people not wanting to lose their jobs and livelihoods after 30 years of work really gets under poor John's skin. I guess when you make millions shilling for billionaires it makes one thin skinned.

More Bush News Smears...

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/07/25/israeli-newspaper-draws-criticism-after-publishing-obamas-western-wall-prayer/

This is a disgusting violation of Obama's privacy. I'm sure there will be no comment from Joe Lieberman or the Israeli government. This was done to tarnish Obama, probably at the order of the Republican Party, possibly with the participation of the corrupt government of Israel.

Fox News, the Newest Supermarket Tabloid...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,391426,00.html

Why should I believe the Enquirer and some random, probably Republican, security guard? Edwards probably wasn't even there that night. This is just more of Faux News taking any opportunity to insult Democrats.

It's Almost Like They Enjoy Being Angry...

http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/doing_it_for_the_fence_sitters/

Indeed. Catholics creating a fake controversy to slam a liberal, imagine that...

Prince of Darkness...

http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/robert_novak_denies_hit_and_run_even_as_witness_saw_victim_on_his_car/

Looks like Novak knowingly fled the scene of an accident and only returned when he found out there was a witness. What a lovely guy. No wonder they call him the Prince of Darkness.

Most Politicians Wish They Had Obama's Jewish Problem...

http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/bRuz/~3/342551692/2008_07_20_archive.html

But Obama totally still has a Jewish problem...

Lieberman is such an ass that everyone hates his guts. This may actually be the thing to unite the country, a universal hatred of Joe.

Sheep Always Come Around in the End...

http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/feeling_left_out_of_the_game_dobson_finally_sucks_it_up_for_mccain/

I knew Dobson would eventually comply with his masters' wishes and endorse McCain. He knows which party pays his bills. At the end of the day, the conservatives and evangelicals who swore up and down they'd never vote for McCain will vote for him. Not because they believe in him in particular but because they're all sheep.

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Liars, all of them liars...

http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/barack_obama_was_made_from_clay_and_the_saliva_of_the_gods/

I agree that it's probably best that the right-wingers are concerning themselves with pointless wanking and conspiracy mongering instead of actually addressing substantive issues. Everyone with half a brain knows that Obama was born in America, if he wasn't I'm sure this information would have been discovered long ago by much smarter people who don't spend all day in front of a computer in their pajamas.

As for their "expert", I am loathe to even believe he's a forensic expert since we do after all have only their word on this fact. Even if he is somehow employed at a facility that performs forensic testing (perhaps he's the janitor), it doesn't make him a saint or above reproach. Anybody can be gotten to. I have no doubt that a right-wing true believer would fake all sorts of things to help McCain win. Besides, I doubt too many people reading that blog are expert enough to refute his claims. I know my eyes glossed over a few paragraphs in. He could have reproduced chapter 10 from To Kill a Mockingbird in the middle there and no one would have known.

It's typical right-wing behavior. They trot out someone who they claim is an expert on something. That person then makes all kinds of statements of supposed fact that sail right over the heads of the majority of the readers in order to claim that something untoward is going on. They rely on the fact that their readership is by and large way too dumb to even begin to understand what's being said and can be counted on to just swallow whatever they're told since they've been taught from youth to buckle to authority in all cases.

This kind of shit, pointless as it is, really does get under my skin though. Do they honestly think they're the only people in the world with brains? What do they think McCain's people are doing (or Hillary's people for that matter)? Do they think there's some sort of huge conspiracy among the Republican establishment to ignore something that, if true, would be a bombshell that would blow this entire election apart? If there was a shred of truth to this bullshit the Republicans would be all over it. After all, they've made a big deal out of far less. There is no reason to believe that McCain's people would ignore something that would guarantee him the Presidency.

Hillary's people also don't seem like the type who would have ignored this for all those months she refused to leave the race. They threw everything but the kitchen sink at Barack. They would have loved to have something like this in April or May. It seems awful weird that they would completely forget to bring it up.

Everyone who bought the "Rathergate" bull should take a lesson from this one. Everyone in the right-wing is batshit insane. There is nothing off limits to them. They would lie about their own grandmother if it would get Republicans elected. Nothing they say can be believed, in fact if you hear them say something it's safe to assume it's a lie. I think a lot of people owe Dan Rather a huge apology. I wouldn't believe these psychos if they told me the roof was on fire and I smelled smoke.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Bad Idea...

http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/elizabeth_dole_proposes_naming_aids_bill_after_homophobe_jesse_helms/

Next we could name a civil rights law after Strom Thurmond. Perhaps name a journalism school after Tony Snow.

And This is His Strong Suit...

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/15/1200003.aspx

Remember what happened the last time we elected a President who couldn't name the countries of the world or their leaders...

McCain has no excuse. At least Bush could point to his relatively insignificant experience as Governor of Texas. McCain claims foreign policy is his strong suit. If he can't even remember that Czechoslovakia was broken up into two separate nations in the 90s, why should we trust him to be President? After all, he was in the Senate when this happened, you'd think he'd remember.

Sexist jerk...

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/15/mccain-finds-rape-hilarious/

Are the PUMA's still going to vote for this guy just to spite Obama? Who wants to guess how often this will be mentioned on the news?

Chuck Norris doesn't know anything about government...

http://whiskeyfire.typepad.com/whiskey_fire/2008/07/dream-kid-the-s.html

Can we all agree that Chuck Norris should shut the hell up?

I believe just as we have one governor per state, we should consider reducing Congress to one representative and two senators per state (the minimum the Constitution requires). If one representative works for Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming, why can't it work for the rest of the states? Here's a movie we all can star in: "Honey, I Shrunk the Congress!"

Sure, because it's not enough that the less populated, conservative states have disproportionate representation in the Senate, they must also have unfair power in the House. Because this country will be so much better when the same number of Representatives represent the 626,932 people of Alaska as represent the 36,553,215 people who live in California. It's bad enough the Senate works this way but that was part of a compromise which gave us the House. If we destroy the House, we end up with the tyranny of the small states that we were trying to avoid.

Saturday, July 12, 2008

Mind Your Own Business Part II...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/07/12/pope.anglican.ap/index.html

I'm sure that just fills their hearts with gladness. It's like having Jack Kevorkian wish you a speedy recovery.

Benedict said he did not want to "interfere" in the debate.

Then what was all that crap earlier in the week about how Jesus only loved men and female bishops were an affront to God? Huh you Prada wearing bastard?

Good Riddance to Bad Garbage Part II...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/12/obit.snow/index.html

Cue the whitewashed, fawning obits that completely omit the horrible things he's done.

Man, these conservatives are dropping like flies lately, aren't they?

Stupid Conservatives, Crazy No Matter Where You Are...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080710/pl_nm/germany_obama_dc

This is absurd. If McCain wanted to give a speech in Germany, Merkel would be falling over herself to say yes. This is politics plain and simple. She's a right-wing fascist and she knows the Republicans are her party in Washington.

Silly Superstition...

http://www.myfoxorlando.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail;jsessionid=624E1C2F1D1C31C4844F655CD2979273?contentId=6932236&version=2&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=1.1.1&sflg=1

Ok, seriously, it's just a stupid piece of bread. Regardless of what supernatural powers you ascribe to it, it's not worth killing someone over.

You Were Right the First Time...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7495754.stm

How ironic that the first time the Bush Administration says something truthful they end up apologizing for it. Everything they said was true, and was sourced from a legitimate source of such information. The only reason Berlusconi was elected the first time is because he owns all the media in Italy. Despite this, his reign was so horrible that he actually lost to the more liberal party. The only way he was able to claw his corrupt way back into power was by launching an all out media assault on his opponent, using his complete stranglehold on the media, in conjunction with the Catholic Church. I give him a few years before the people of Italy remember why they hate him so much and kick his ass to the curb.

Mind Your Own Business..

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/07/08/women.bishops/index.html

How nice of them to jump in where they have no business going. I'm sure the Anglicans are devastated that the Vatican, a hyper corrupt irrelevant body which they wisely left hundreds of years ago, disapproves of their personal decision not to treat their female ministers as second class citizens.

The move by the Anglican Church's General Synod "is a rift to the apostolic tradition" of ordaining only men as bishops, the Vatican said in a statement, and is another obstacle to reconciliation between Anglicans and Roman Catholics.

Evidently they don't interpret the Bible in a way that needlessly excludes half the population (and many of the most active church members).

The catholic church has never really been interested in reconciliation with anyone. That would require both sides to make sacrifices and that's never been their intention. They want all other churches to come together, declare they were wrong, and bow before the Pope.

Some traditionalists have threatened to abandon the Anglican Church for the Roman Catholic Church if women become bishops. Several hundred Anglican priests made that move when women were first ordained 16 years ago.

You gotta do what you gotta do. If you bow down to extremists they're always going to keep making demands. Better to lose them now than wait until you've given up half the church and they leave anyway.

David Holding, a traditionalist church member, said he does not object to female bishops, but "there must be a proper provision made for those who can't go along with it."

You can't start creating situations in any organization where people can circumvent the hierarchy just because they want to. What's to prevent racists from refusing to obey a black bishop? Creating special classes of bishop for women, which are essentially inferior to all other bishops, is worse than refusing to ordain women bishops at all. Who is going to respect a female bishop who has no authority over her churches?

Your Band Sucks...

http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080708/COLUMNISTS22/807080309/1005/OPINION

I knew there was something I hated about this guy. Just another stuck up moron who wears his Bush worship like a badge of honor, pretending that everyone else is too stupid to see how great the Republicans and their war are.

Silence...

http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/bRuz/~3/330276130/2008_07_06_archive.html

Joe Lieberman's BFF makes another inexcusable comment that the media will never mention.

Next Time Make Up Your Own Story...

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1820685,00.html

Oops, not only is the story absurd, it's not even original...

Good Riddance to Bad Garbage...

http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2008/07/goodbye-and-good-riddance.html

I forgot to mention this when it happened. Honestly, I'm not sad. He was a horrible man. I hope he suffered.

Saturday, June 21, 2008

Obama's Supposed Swing State Troubles...

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x2882.xml?ReleaseID=1187

So much for the myth that Obama would have problems in key swing states. He's already got a significant lead in those states. McCain might as well be the incumbent so his numbers can only get worse. The media has been shouting for 8 years about how great McCain is, how much of a maverick he is, how different he is. There isn't a person in this country who hasn't heard of him and developed an opinion about him.

Clinton and McCain have spent the last few months throwing everything they could think of at him, including preposterous claims of drug use and gay sex manufactured by some crazy guy. If Obama's numbers are this good even after that, it's a very good sign.

It Would Only Be Fair...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,369485,00.html

So I guess the Israeli military will be tearing down the houses of these guys' grandmothers any day now.

Bush Tries to Kidnap a World Leader?...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,369467,00.html

It wouldn't surprise me at all if this was true. The Bush Administration is nothing but a bunch of thugs.

Ha...

http://www.womenforjohnmccain.com/

Right-Wing Corporate Lies...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,369084,00.html

So let me get this straight Junk Science; global warming is a total hoax, and even if it does exist humans totally aren't involved, but somehow Gore is irresponsible for living in a way you claim doesn't do any harm?

The problem as it's always been stated has been the source of the electricity, not the amount you use. Gore has gone to great personal expense to fit his residence with solar power. I would imagine most, if not all, of his power is provided by his solar panels. Therefore, his house isn't contributing to global warming any more than my solar calculator.

Also; suggesting that Gore somehow has a conflict of interest, and is only hyping the companies because of his personal investments, is laughable especially coming from the joker who wrote this article. Of course Gore is going to invest in companies with which he agrees on environmental issues since that is an important factor for him. The fact that he endorses them has nothing to do with his investments and everything to do with his values. Junk Science, as the website of Steven Milloy is known, is a clearinghouse of global warming denial and fake "scientific" information. The only Junk Science involved comes from Milloy himself. He actually does make money by hyping these lies. He is in the employ of several large corporations who would rather not be held responsible for their corporate crimes against the environment. I wouldn't hold my breath though for any mention in his articles of his huge conflict of interest.

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

With Friends Like These...

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/top_lieberman_staffer_we_begge.php

That's what you get for helping Joe Lieberman. He's only in it for himself. He'd walk over his own family to get what he wants.

More From the Republican's Favorite Attention Whores...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,364874,00.html

Will these opportunistic whores ever go away? I swear, they're like rats, they scurry from their holes any time they smell the sweet stench of Republican money. You'd think they'd want to be remembered for more than making up lies about a President so the Republicans would pay them millions of dollars. I guess that's the best they can hope for.

McCain's False Outsider Credentials...

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/TheNote/story?id=3105288&page=1

Only the Republican obsessed, Washington media establishment could suggest that McCain deserves the label of "outsider". How many years do you have to be in Congress, and how many lobbyists do you have to have living in your ass, before you stop being an outsider? Of course, this deference is only given to Republicans. Obama's only been in Washington for a few years and somehow they've decided he's more of an insider than McCain who's been in Washington for a few decades.

Good Luck There...

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Story?id=5029712&page=1

This is the dumbest thing I've ever seen. Just another example of smug bullshit from the fundie crowd. They're going to be awfully embarrassed when the rapture never happens.

Keep Politics out of Medicine...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24844532/

It took Mary Vargas six months and repeated hormone shots to get pregnant with her second child. “We were so excited,” Vargas, 35, remembers about the day she learned the treatments had worked.

Remember this information because according to the anti-choice industry she's a heartless bitch who doesn't care a bit about the fetus she aborted.

Now nearly 22 weeks pregnant, Vargas had two choices: terminate immediately or wait, in which case she would miscarry at any point or spontaneously go into labor at as early as 28 weeks. If her son was still alive at his delivery, doctors warned, he would perish within a short time. And that death would likely be very painful for him. “As a parent, your job is to make sure your child doesn’t suffer unnecessarily,” she says. “He had no chance at life. What we had to think about was how he was going to die. It wasn’t about choice, because the option we wanted — to have our baby — was no longer available.”

This is the real face of late-term abortion. The anti-choice movement doesn't give a shit about this fetus. They wanted him to be born into this world, if he even beat the odds and lived long enough to be born, and spend his very short life in absolute agony. No rational human being would wish that futile, painful existence on anyone.

Later-term abortions — those performed at 16 weeks and beyond — account for only 4.3 percent of the 1.21 million pregnancies ended in the United States each year, according to the Guttmacher Institute in New York City.

Don't tell that to the anti-choice racket. To hear them speak, you'd think there were roving gangs of doctors traveling the countryside by bus enticing young, pregnant women to get abortions at the last minute.

Now, unless a physician can offer unequivocal proof that a patient would die without a D&X, the doctor risks being fined $250,000 and sent to prison for up to two years.

No doctor should have to fear for himself or his family because he performs a needed medical procedure.

At first they considered an induction and delivery, which would give the Vargases a chance to hold him.

“But that didn’t seem like it was best for him,” Vargas says. “I can’t imagine that I would choose to be born into bright lights and alarms and not being able to breathe, even with my mother holding me.”


The fact that they even thought of this shows how even people who end up making the right decision are poisoned by the propaganda of the far-right anti-choice crowd. They were actually considering torturing their unborn child for who knows how long just to make some moron they don't even know feel better about his/her prejudices.

She gets her insurance via her husband’s employer, the federal government, which has a long-standing policy forbidding employees from purchasing any health plan that covers abortion.

That's absurd, we really need to get these Republicans out of office immediately. They are ruining our country.

The nonmedical term partial-birth abortion, coined by the anti-abortion movement, grew out of the idea that the D&X procedure “most resembles infanticide because the baby’s body is outside the uterus already,” says Mailee Smith, a staff counsel for Americans United for Life, a pro-life law and policy group in Chicago.

So she admits that they invented the term, which has no basis in medicine, to scare people.

“In order to prevent the blurring of the lines between infanticide and partial-birth abortion, it’s necessary to ban partial-birth abortion,” she adds.

Or we could continue to allow medical professionals to make medical decisions and tell these people, who have no medical knowledge whatsoever, to go to hell.

The Vargases, like other families, were intent on minimizing their son’s suffering.

That's what normal, loving people do. The anti-choice crowd, on the other hand, gets off one causing as much suffering as possible to both mother and fetus.

In a 2005 study published in The Journal of the American Medical Association, researchers at the University of California at San Francisco found that, based on existing studies of how babies’ brains develop in utero, pain is unlikely to be experienced before around 29 or 30 weeks. Yet a proposed federal law would require doctors to warn women aborting at 20 weeks or after that their baby may feel pain and to offer anesthesia for the fetus; several states have also passed or proposed bills on the issue. Little or no data exists on whether attempts to provide fetal anesthesia would help the fetus or harm the mother, leading the UCSF researchers to write that it “should not be recommended or routinely offered for abortion because current experimental techniques provide unknown fetal benefit and may increase risks for women.”

So you're telling me that even though all available science tells one story, the anti-choicers are pushing an irresponsible and possibly dangerous procedure on women just for the sake of scoring political points. I'm shocked.

Forcing women to undergo unnecessary medical procedures that have no rational benefit for mother or fetus, and may in fact hurt one or both of them, is disgusting but unfortunately par for the course with these people.

The D&X technique is so uncommon that many doctors who perform second-trimester abortions, including Dr. Nichols and Dr. Greene, have never used it.

Again, don't let Operation Rescue hear you. To hear them speak you'd think there were abortion mobiles driving around cities performing late-term abortions on demand.

In this new, threatening climate, doctors don’t want to leave any opening for prosecutors. As a result, hospitals around the country have begun to require that all abortions after 20 weeks be preceded by lethal injection — when the fetus is killed in utero via a shot of digoxin or potassium chloride. The doctor typically injects the drug into the umbilical cord, amniotic fluid or fetal heart via a needle through the patient’s belly the day before the scheduled termination. These injections can be painful for the woman and increase her risk for infection and spontaneous delivery away from the clinic or hospital.

Silly women, you think the people who make these rules give a shit about your life? It's all about that fetus, the more pain the mother experiences the better for these sickos.

“Nowhere else in medicine do doctors require a patient to go through an invasive procedure like this purely for legal reasons,” Dr. Nichols says.

Nowhere else in medicine do you have a medical procedure so unique to women, so tied into every backwards right-wing idea of female subservience, that these anti-choice whackos can't wait to pile on laws to ensure maximum pain and suffering for the women unfortunate enough to get pregnant.

“As doctors we take an oath to do no harm, yet these injections — while the risk is low — are potentially harmful to the mother. And we make patients get them not to benefit them, but to protect ourselves from going to jail. I’m forced to choose my well-being over that of my patients.”

And that is why non-doctors should never be allowed to trump doctors for petty political reasons.

She asked her obstetricians when she could terminate. The head of the practice replied, “We call that murder.” Another doctor in the practice was willing to induce, but, Audrey says, warned her “she couldn’t prevent a nurse from running into the OR with life support. The idea of holding a baby as its organs failed — we couldn’t think of anything worse.”

So evidently there are also doctors and nurses who don't know anything about medicine. I guess someone has to graduate at the bottom of their class.

Directly across a parking lot from Dr. Tiller’s clinic is a facility with a different take on what to do about ill-fated pregnancies. Choices Medical Clinic, a privately funded nonprofit, opened in 1999 and is one of as many as 2,500 “crisis pregnancy centers” nationwide that exist to persuade pregnant women to avoid abortion. Choices was one of the first centers to offer perinatal hospice: end-of-life services for fetuses akin to the standard hospice care available to the sick and the elderly.

These places sicken me. They pretend to be medical centers when in reality they are just places where women are guilted into continuing pregnancies until the fetus is born or it is too late to get a legal abortion. They practice quackery and provide pseudo-medical services such as this hospice care, which I'm sure they charge highly for. In the end they prolong the pain for both fetus and mother and help no one.

The facility doesn’t provide primary medical care; deliveries or inductions are done at local hospitals.

That's because they're not actually doctors, though they pretend to be doctors in order to confuse impressionable young women.

But women who enlist its hospice services are invited to have free sonograms every day of their doomed pregnancy

All those unnecessary procedures can't be good for anyone's health.

and, if they find it a comfort, can have free professional pictures taken of them and their dead or dying children after they are born.

That's just morbid, really sick stuff.

Kim Ortmeier, a 35-year-old stay-at-home mom, first learned about perinatal hospice from her obstetrician.

Prescribing voodoo shit like this should be illegal.

“Abortion was never a consideration,” says Ortmeier, a devout Catholic. “We told our doctor we’d do whatever we could to give her the best possible life she could have.”

Maybe big words are a problem for them but the doctor made it clear the fetus wouldn't have a life. Gasping for air for 20 minutes and then dying doesn't constitute a life. They increased their own suffering, and the suffering of their fetus, for no other reason than the invisible voice in the sky told them to.

When her obstetrician recommended they contact Choices, Ortmeier hesitated. “Because the services were free I wondered if they were quality,” she says.

They should have gone with that thought. Not everything free is low-quality, but in this case that is certainly true.

in Minnesota, women seeking to abort fetuses with fatal anomalies are required by law to be informed about hospice as an alternative.

Another instance of unnecessary obstacles being placed before confused, scared women for no legitimate medical reason.

The Myth of Obama's Jewish Problem...

http://www.newsweek.com/id/140476

Of course it's a myth. It was concocted out of nothing by Republicans, right-wing Jews and Israel hawks who wish we would nuke Iran. None of these people were going to vote for Obama, or Clinton, anyway. They were about as likely to vote Democratic as Joe Lieberman.

But so did rumors that he had a "problem" with Jewish voters because of his family background (middle name: Hussein)

We call that racism.

and that some of his aides held pro-Palestinian views.

How dare they, don't they know that the only acceptable political position is to support the Israeli policy of killing the Palestinian population one smart bomb at a time?

New Jersey Rep. Robert Andrews, an Obama backer, says that two months ago a top Hillary campaign operative told him Obama would have a "hard time winning in November" because of his alleged Jewish problem and indicated Clinton's campaign was going to take advantage of those fears. Andrews says he found such talk "offensive," but he didn't know whether Hillary had sanctioned it. Asked for comment, the Clinton campaign referred NEWSWEEK to an article in the Newark (N.J.) Star-Ledger, in which spokesman Phil Singer called similar comments by Andrews "sad and divisive."

Rob Andrews is not the guy you want trumpeting your position. He's a weasley, opportunistic ass and I wouldn't believe him if he said the sky was blue. That being said, he's right on this one thing.

McCain has enlisted high-profile help of his own to help win Jewish votes: Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman, a self-described "independent Democrat" who has criticized Obama's leadership qualities, has agreed to head up a booster group called Citizens for McCain.

Lieberman is the worst person in the world. I would move to Connecticut just to vote against him. A Republican would be better than him in his seat.

In a brief but animated Senate floor confrontation last week, according to a campaign aide who asked for anonymity when talking about private discussions, Obama told Lieberman he was surprised by Lieberman's personal attacks and his half-hearted denials of the false rumors that Obama is a Muslim.

Obama should have punched him in the face.

Protesting Too Much...

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/home_top_stories/20080609_A_fight_to_block_parish_merger.html

Wow, these people are really just losing their minds over this. I don't understand what they expect to happen though. The Catholics that haven't already fled the stinking corpse that is the Catholic Church aren't going to church. They can't keep all the churches open for two or three people. Those churches were designed for a time when the church was still considered perfect and Catholics felt compelled to attend mass. They can't be kept open now that people know better.

The organization supports five Boston churches where parishioners are sleeping inside to prevent the archdiocese from padlocking the doors.

We used to call that criminal trespass.

Some local parishioners are even asking the Vatican to intervene, and others seek the bishop's recall.

Ouch, the guy's just trying to balance the budget in tough times and they're going after his job. It makes you almost feel sorry for the guy, almost.

"We as a people have been silent too long," said Walsh, 59. More Catholics are now willing to speak out, believing that blind obedience to the Catholic Church played a role in the child-abuse cases involving priests, he said.

Maybe you should have been on the front lines back then when important things were happening instead of being silent then and bitching now when the issue is a stupid building.

Walsh has been requesting a meeting with the bishop to show him how Queen of Peace can be saved.

I'm sure he's hearing the same about every church in the diocese. He can't keep them all. These people are too selfish to realize they're not the only Catholics in South Jersey.

She and Walsh are cochairs of the Alternate Options Committee,

aka the Close Their Church, Not Ours Committee. Six months from now, when the spineless bishop finally caves into this campaign, we'll be hearing from all those churches.

and it just finished paying about $200,000 for a new church roof and renovations, Walsh said.

Maybe they should have checked with the diocese before laying out that kind of money. It's their own fault for making such a frivolous purchase when they weren't sure their parish would stay open.

"I want to bring them back to church," he said. The consolidation plan is designed to do this, by instilling new life in the parishes, he said.

If you had the ability to bring people back to the church you wouldn't be closing all these churches. Ten years from now you'll be closing even more churches because your ideas are bankrupt. You have nothing to offer people. Within the next twenty-five years, the Catholic Church will be a fringe religion practiced by a few whackos and a bunch of people in third-world countries who only stick around because they want the missionaries to continue giving them food. It will be completely dead in the Western World.

As for the picketing, Galante said he understood that people are emotional because they don't want change and are attached to their churches.

Violent resistance to change is part and parcel of Catholic teaching. You can't teach it for years and then bitch when they turn the hatred towards you.

People really need to get over this. Millions of Catholics have moved on and realized there are more important things than bowing before a statue and eating stale bread and shitty wine. That's healthy. These people can't expect everything to stand still just because they're really serious about it.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Ted Kennedy...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/20/kennedy.tumor/index.html

I was truly saddened to hear about this last weekend. At first, they were saying he was having a stroke. When they announced that it was only a seizure, we were relieved. It seems it wasn't as good a development as it appeared. Hopefully this will be operable and he will live for many more years. We can't stand to lose a man like Kennedy. Even though he will be replaced by a Democrat, thanks to the Governor of Mass. being a Dem, nobody can truly replace Ted Kennedy.

Now She's Making Threats...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080523/ap_on_el_pr/clinton

That sounds awfully like a threat to me...

The thing that Clinton realizes but is lying about is that when her husband ran for President, and when Kennedy ran, the primaries weren't stacked up in January and February and they weren't completely done by June. When Bill Clinton ran for President, there were primaries still to be decided in June. This year they were all but over a month ago. The states which voted in May (with the exception of Oregon), and the ones still to come in June, are mostly small states with little if any relevance given the large lead Obama already has. One wonders what excuse Hillary will use once June 3 passes.

When Did We Become Someone Else's Puppet Regime?...

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1808811,00.html

Here we go again. You'd think that after two failed wars (one which was also heavily lobbied for by Israel) the Bush Administration would get the message. They suck at waging wars and everything they touch turns to shit.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut grilled Petraeus on Iran's anti-U.S. activities in the region.

I can only imagine the appearance of Joe Lieberman, literally salivating over the notion of bombing another Muslim country.

And Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia pressed Petraeus on what he meant by the need to "counter malign Iranian influence" and the "consequences for its illegitimate influence in the region."

What about our illegitimate influence in the region? At least Iran's leaders don't need dozens of helicopters and thousands of troops just to take a stroll in the park.

The general, whose confirmation as head of U.S. Central Command was stake in the hearing, did his best to pacify the men and women who held his appointment in their hands, emphasizing his support for "the three rounds of negotiations that have taken place" between Iran, Iraq and the U.S. in Baghdad over security issues.

Petraeus was nominated specifically because he will start a war with Iran. Everyone in Congress knows it. If they didn't know it before, they certainly should have learned the lesson the first time it happened in Iraq. This administration will do anything it can to start wars because it enriches their friends. If Congress confirms Petraeus, knowing full well that he is the Bush Administration's handpicked yes man for war with Iran, then I may just lose all hope I ever had that the Dems are any different from the Republicans. 5 years ago they had an excuse, albeit a flimsy one, since they weren't used to being lied to by a President. Now they have no such excuse. If they buy the same lies, spouted by the same people, they deserve what they get.

In theory, the idea of a war with Iran should be a non-starter in a nation whose war-weary public has no appetite for further military adventures in the Middle East,

When has public opinion ever stopped these morons?

no matter how determined Iran may be to get a nuclear weapon or to arm and train anti-U.S. forces in Iraq.

Of course we have to rely on the word of known liars for all of this. I haven't seen any proof for this that doesn't rely on the same people who lied to us about Iraq.

Republican candidates on Capitol Hill, already facing their worst electoral prospects in a generation, are equally disinclined to support military action against Iran. Even Bush's own cabinet officials, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates have been repeatedly cool to the idea in public.

They're sheep, they'll all fall in line.

In Israel, from which President Bush recently returned, one doesn't have to go far to find deep, existential concern. "A military option is not a good option," for dealing with Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions, a senior Israeli official told TIME on the sidelines of one of Bush's meetings, "But there's only one thing worse than that, which is Iran going nuclear." Those outside the Israeli government express even greater urgency. "I'm worried that by November it's going to be too late," to stop Iran from gaining the ability to produce nuclear weapons, said Yossi Kuperwasser, the former senior intelligence officer for the Central Command of the Israeli Defense.

Since when are we taking orders from Israel? If they're so concerned why don't they attack Iran's nuclear facilities? They did it before in Iraq, what's different now? Why should we continue to sacrifice thousands of our troops in another unnecessary war when they don't even contribute a token number of troops to the present war effort?

On military action against nuclear sites in Iran, he said, "Just do it. For Christ's sake, do it and solve our problem."

I don't give a shit about this guy's "problem". It's not our responsibility to solve this guy's problems.

Nor is it only the Israelis who are concerned. Egyptian and Saudi leaders also expressed their worries about Iran's nuclear ambitions when Bush met with them on the trip, several White House aides say. "People in the region really want to see it solved peacefully," says a senior White House official, "but they're also concerned for their own safety and they're also mindful of the calendar, and they know that this President has been very strong."

But I'll bet Egypt and Saudi Arabia don't want the US to start a world war over it. The only people who want to escalate this to WWIII are Bush and Israel.

If diplomatic efforts continue to look unlikely to produce an outcome acceptable to the Administration, would President Bush consider military action?

How could diplomacy have produced an outcome? Diplomacy hasn't even been tried. Bush openly derides the Democratic Presidential nominee for merely suggesting that we start diplomacy, comparing it to the sacrifice of Czechoslovakia in WWII.

Olmert said his impression after talks with Bush was that the President is "exceptionally determined," and that "he has proven this throughout his term in office his preparedness to take exceptional measures in order to defend the principles in which he believes, and in his deep commitment to the security of the state of Israel."

Translation: Bush will manufacture evidence and lie through his teeth in order to do whatever Olmert tells him to do.

It's that kind of talk that has people in Washington worried. Aides to Democratic leaders on the Hill fear that Bush may be planning to bomb Iran between November and January, after the political cost goes down and when he may feel he is doing his successor a favor.

Well then, perhaps they should actually show some balls and not roll over for him like they did on Iraq.

Dan Senor, former military spokesman and foreign policy advisor to the Bush Administration, says he finds that scenario highly unlikely, because he believes it would provoke numerous resignations from the intelligence community and the armed services, both of which groups feel burned from the Iraq experience.

There were resignations when we invaded Iraq, it didn't make a difference then and it won't now.

It Took You Awfully Long to Make This Decision...

http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2008/05/22/mccains-rejects-hagee-endorsement-spiritual-guide-rod-parsley-now-hits-the-news/

So all these things he said in the past were fine but all of a sudden he's out of line for saying things that he's been saying for years? Are we to believe McCain didn't look at Hagee or Parsley at all before he begged for their endorsements?

Just End it Already...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080525/pl_nm/usa_politics_carter_dc

Why wait until June 3? Obama leads with delegates, he leads with super delegates, he leads in the popular vote, he's going to win the nomination. Why not just end it before Clinton hurts the party more than she already has?

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Rove wants Dems to win now?...

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/19/clinton-cites-karl-rove-as-reason-to-stay-in/#more-7211

And her ego was far too big for her to realize that Karl Rove probably doesn't have the best interests of the Democratic Party in mind. He's a freaking McCain adviser. Does it occur to anyone in her cult that he may be releasing this information because they want her to be elected because they know they can beat her?

Sexism is a convenient excuse for failing miserably...

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4889014&page=1

Clinton, the first woman to make a serious bid for a major party's presidential nomination, said she did not think that racism was a factor in her bruising battle with Sen. Barack Obama.

Perhaps she should tell her surrogates that racism isn't supposed to be a factor in the election because they obviously didn't get the memo. Her surrogate, and her husband, suggesting that Obama is nothing but an affirmative-action candidate. Her campaign putting stories out there about Obama's pastor and his supposed Islamic heritage. Her surrogates suggesting that he attended a madrassah. Her entire campaign strategy has been based on racist. I haven't seen a single statement however criticizing Hillary based on her sex. Not a single one. In fact she's been immune to some criticism that's been leveled at Obama because of her sex.

Her campaign aides told ABC News that she intends to keep campaigning through the final primary on June 3. Clinton also took a shot at Obama for acting as if he has already won and not even campaigning in Kentucky.

Maybe he's acting like he won because he's won. I think he's been very understanding given her refusal to bow out gracefully but at some point he has to get on with winning the election in November, he can't keep holding her hand and saying "No Hillary, you still have a shot" forever.

Clinton's comments in the Washington Post echo what many of her supporters have bitterly complained about as the long Democratic battle has neared an end -- that she is treated differently because she's a woman and if she eventually loses, it will be because of her gender.

If Clinton loses, which she will, it will be because of who she is and who her husband is. It has nothing to do with her gender. Her candidacy has been important because it has proved that most people are willing to look at a woman in the exact same way they look at a man. They looked at her in an objective and fair manner and didn't like what they saw. Accusing them of sexism is petty and stupid.

Clinton, they charge, has been criticized for things that a male candidate would never take heat for -- her appearance, her emotions, her spouse's sex life.

The petty criticisms seem to have been confined to the beginning of the race, I haven't heard anything about her appearance lately. As for her spouse, if a male candidate had as little control over their spouse as she has over hers (to the point where she's screwing everything that moves) you better believe there'd be a lot of comment on it. Nothing strikes at a man's supposed manhood like being a cuckold. If anything, she gets a lot more sympathy than a male candidate would in a similar situation.

And many of her female supporters worry that their chance to see a woman elected U.S. president ends with Clinton.

She's not the only viable female candidate around. That kind of egotism is what got her into this situation in the first place.

"If Hillary Clinton is not the nominee, we will not support the nominee," she said.

That's the stupidest thing someone could do. Do these women think McCain will care about women's issues? Obama has great ratings from women's rights organizations, McCain doesn't.

"Young people don't understand how far we've come and how hard we've worked to get here. They can't see what it took for us to ensure that Clinton would have a chance at the White House. We have been out there fighting these fights and we've made progress. But as soon as she started running, all this sexist garbage comes out," she said

And I suppose blacks have never had a problem getting elected to public office? Not to mention the constant racism coming from the Republicans, the media and the Clinton campaign from the point he emerged as a viable candidate.

In an ABC News-Washington Post poll, nearly a quarter of Clinton supporters said if she loses, they will vote for Republican nominee Sen. John McCain of Arizona over Obama.

There's a very selfish and self-righteous cultishness that permeates the Clinton campaign and it's sickening.

"Women will always have to work harder than men to prove their competence. A man would never be subjected to the same treatment," she said. "It will be hugely disappointing to many women if Clinton is unable to go the distance. But there are plenty of very strong women in public office and other venues who will pick up the torch. Without a doubt, a woman will be president."

I honestly think Clinton's people have forgotten that Obama is black. He's not treated like any other man, he gets just as much crap as she does. Nobody talks constantly about her pastor and I'm sure he's said some pretty crazy, anti-Democratic (anti-democratic too) things. I doubt her pastor is pro-choice, pro-gay and pro-birth control all of which are key Democratic issues.

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Stop Throwing Away Good Money...

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/11/clinton-adviser-clinton-willing-to-lend-campaign-more-money/

When is it going to end with Hillary? Her campaign is racing full speed towards the cliff and nobody's thinking to put on the brakes. This money she's throwing at her campaign is not going to make any difference. She's already contributed so much while Obama's momentum just increases. By the time she finally decides to drop out she's going to have a huge debt she'll be unable to repay. I don't think Obama should do anything to help her out if she keeps throwing away all this money for nothing, he's going to need every dollar he can get for the general election. Even in the unlikely eventuality that she manages to steal the election, she's going to enter the general election with a huge money problem and no proof that people will suddenly start showering her with money. I know that while I will support her if she's the nominee, I certainly will not be giving her any money.

Saturday, May 10, 2008

The Writing's On The Wall...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/07/democrats.race/index.html

From all that I've heard it appears that Hillary is beginning to see the writing on the wall. People are suggesting that the superdelegates are rushing to Obama and Hillary is making plans to drop out after the late May primaries. I really hope that's true. I've also heard she's going to start acting like a Dem and tone down the hateful rhetoric about Obama.

Sen. Hillary Clinton vowed to stay in the race until her party has a nominee.

What Hillary doesn't understand, or at least doesn't say, is that the party won't have a nominee until she drops out. It's not meant to be for her. She's the only one who can give us a nominee and she can do it by dropping out and endorsing Obama.

Wizardry?!?...

http://www.tampabays10.com/news/local/article.aspx?storyid=79533

This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Wizardry!?!? WTF????

First off, last I checked religious beliefs are not sufficient reason for someone to be fired. Since this was a public school district he should sue them, they just can't do that. Second, cheap magic tricks you learn off the back of a crackerjack box do not equal Wizardry. I swear, there are some fucked up people in parts of this country.

And I really want to know what fucked up kid ratted the poor teacher out. How badly did his/her parents screw him up that the first thought upon seeing someone perform a magic trick is to have them burned as a witch?

Hillary's Convenient Voter's Rights Position...

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/05/hillary_campaign_says_no_to_ne.php

Does anybody actually believe that Hillary gives a crap about the voters of Michigan or Florida? If she had lost the states she'd be demanding that they not be counted. The only thing she cares about is winning. While I wouldn't be devastated if they were counted in a fair and reasonable way (like the one that the state agreed to), they did break the rules. They're not owed anything. Whatever they get is really a gift from the DNC.

And does anybody else question Hillary's sincerity about staying in so everyone in the last states can have a say? If their roles were reversed, Hillary would have started calling for Obama to drop out sometime in February. Bill would be on the stump every day spouting racial codewords and demanding that Obama drop out. They would be screaming for all to hear that she has an insurmountable lead and he's being unreasonable to stay in. In short, everything that Obama has avoided doing even as he has amassed an unassailable lead over Hillary.

Pope Nazi Makes Another Stupid Statement...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/05/10/pope.sex.ap/index.html

It's almost cute that Pope Nazi thinks anyone cares what he has to say. His own followers don't obey his edicts. Millions of Catholics use birth control. More than half of Catholics support birth control (and I can only imagine the huge majority who would support a woman choosing artificial insemination if that was necessary). All these statements do is prove how little power the Vatican actually has over its own people.

"No mechanical technique can substitute the act of love that two married people exchange as a sign of a greater mystery," Benedict said.

Said the freaky old guy in a dress who took a voluntary oath to never have sex. Here's a hint Joe, it wouldn't be a mystery to you if you hadn't taken the oath.

Kentucky and W. Virginia...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/09/west.virginia/index.html

West Virginians will head to the polls Tuesday for the state's Democratic primary between Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. But what will the vote there really mean after new delegate totals show Obama with a sizable lead?

I don't see what difference W. Virginia and Kentucky will make. Even if they go to Hillary with huge margins, that's been the expectation from the start. It will not come as a surprise that the old, white, largely uneducated populations of these states go for Hillary. Those people are her bread and butter.

Clinton has a 43-point advantage over Obama, 66 percent to 23 percent, according to a survey from the American Research Group released Friday.

While I doubt these numbers, even if she wins both states by this much it won't matter much. These are small states with very few Democratic delegates. They're some of the reddest of red states. They're not swing states. They're the very epitome of the kind of state that Hillary said shouldn't count in deciding the Democratic nominee (I guess traditional red states only don't count if they vote for Obama). How is she going to explain counting these states as "game changers" when she said the exact opposite of all the red states Obama won?

A big Clinton win will send a powerful message that there are a lot of Democrats not ready to get on the Obama bandwagon.

Everybody has to make a choice. Just because I voted for Obama in our primary doesn't mean I wouldn't vote for Hillary if she was the nominee. Just because these people may prefer Hillary doesn't mean they won't vote for Obama when the choice comes in November. People need to stop acting like everyone in America's rural heartland is an ignorant racist who will never vote for Obama just because Hillary happens to be their first choice.

"There was just an AP article posted that found how Sen. Obama's support among hardworking Americans, white Americans is weakening again, and how the whites in both states that have not completed college were supporting me," Clinton said in a USA Today interview May 7.

Hillary needs to stop making racist statements, it's not doing her any favors. Last I checked, whites weren't the group that votes 90+% Democratic.

"They would likely paint him, if he's the nominee, as a far-left liberal who is pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, pro-civil union. That will not play well in West Virginia. Social issues register very high on the meter here," Bass said.

Every Democratic President since Roe v. Wade has been pro-choice. I don't see how they would vote for all those Dems but not Obama.

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Clintonistas go apoplectic over Richardson endorsement...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/22/us/politics/22richardson.html...

Man, I have all the respect in the world for President Clinton and all he accomplished, though he could have done far more if he hadn't spent half his time kissing up to the Republicans and the DLC, but the Clintons and their people are seriously flawed human beings. I mean, totally fucked in the head. There is something deeply wrong with them. In this regard they're really no better than Bush or Karl Rove.

"An act of betrayal," said James Carville, an adviser to Mrs. Clinton and a friend of Mr. Clinton.

How dare he decide Obama is a better choice? Doesn't he know his place? Clinton spent a lot of time doing things for Richardson with the expectation that Richardson would do something for him in the future. Hasn't Bill Richardson ever seen the Godfather?

"Mr. Richardson’s endorsement came right around the anniversary of the day when Judas sold out for 30 pieces of silver, so I think the timing is appropriate, if ironic," Mr. Carville said, referring to Holy Week.

Pure crazy gold. So now, all of a sudden, endorsing someone else is akin to selling someone out to be executed in one of the most gruesome and prolonged ways possible. These guys are good.

...Mark Penn, played down the importance of the Richardson endorsement, suggesting that the time "when it could have been effective has long since passed."

I doubt he'd be saying that if Richardson had endorsed Hillary. But of course all the Clinton people seem to be truth challenged so I guess it's not a surprise. Just say it Mark, you're jealous. You joined the wrong campaign and now you're bitter because Obama's kicking your ass.

Mr. Richardson said he was dispirited by the tone of the Democratic nominating fight, reflecting a sentiment that has been increasingly voiced by party leaders. Unlike many others, though, Mr. Richardson placed the blame on Mrs. Clinton.

Who is blaming Obama? The blame falls quite clearly at the feet of Hillary and her campaign. Who created the 3am ad? Who endorsed McCain over her Democratic opponent? Who has been trying her hardest to destroy any chances of Obama winning should he be the nominee?

Mr. Richardson was still wearing the beard that he grew during what he called a period of decompression after leaving the presidential race.

Is this some sort of rule now? You have to grow a beard when you leave the Presidential race? First Gore and now Richardson, what will Hillary do?

Sunday, March 02, 2008

Don't Mess With Texas...

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/02/gun-incident-near-president-bushs-ranch/

Those old ladies in Texas don't mess around. Can you imagine the headlines on Monday if she had shot him?

Crazed Film Murderers for Hillary...

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/02/jack-nicholson-endorses-clinton/

Perhaps someone should inform Hillary that receiving the endorsement of the Joker and the asshole Colonel from A Few Good Men is not a good thing, not to mention the murderous father from the Shining. Who's next? Ralph Fiennes as Voldamort? Christopher Lee? Anthony Hopkins?

The End of the Campaign is Nigh...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/01/clinton.snl/index.html

Hillary is really getting desperate. SNL already gave her free campaign commercials in the opening skits two weeks in a row. Now she comes on the show herself and drives home the fact that she really can't stand the thought of losing. If she spent as much time thinking up winning strategies as she does whining about how unfair everything is she'd be winning this thing. Now she's stuck bitching on SNL about how nobody's falling in line behind her candidacy.

Saturday, February 23, 2008

People Should Concentrate on Doing Their Jobs...

http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/02/06/abnormal-paps-pap-smears-doctors-refusing-canada

Ok, seriously, this shit has to stop. If you don't want to do your job then quit. Go flip fucking hamburgers at McDonalds. If you're a doctor, be a doctor. If your patient wants a pap smear, give her one. I don't care if she's married or not, that's really none of your business either. If she wants the pill, give her the pill, that's your job. If she's pregnant and she wants a referral for an abortion, give her one, it's not your job to make medical decisions against your patient's wishes. If you're a pharmacist, you shouldn't be able to pick and choose what prescriptions you fill. You see that piece of paper in front of you, that's a prescription. If you wanted to write prescriptions maybe you should have chosen a different specialty. If you want to put your stupid superstitions ahead of medicine, you chose the wrong damn profession.

I can't pick and choose what parts of my job I want to perform and neither should anyone else. You'll notice you don't see any of these sexist assholes refusing to prescribe Viagra to unmarried men. Somehow it seems Christian morality only extends to refusing vital medical care to women.

I guess Canada isn't always the liberal oasis we think it is.

Monday, February 18, 2008

Obama...

Ha ha ha...

Remember Ol' Zell?...

http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/06/lieberman-has-superdelegate-status-stripped-because-of-mccain-endorsement/

See, Ol' Zell was good for something.

False Priorities...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/wayoflife/01/25/archbishop.coach.ap/index.html

I really don't see what his opinion on abortion has to do with winning basketball games. He wasn't hired to teach theology. I've always said that the quality of a Catholic college is inversely proportional to the amount of influence the church as a whole has on its operations. This is a perfect example of this. The only thing that should matter is that he wins the games, everything else is pretty much meaningless.

Scary...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/15/university.shooting/index.html

The fact that he was supposed to be taking meds and stopped doesn't surprise me. I have experience with someone who stopped taking meds and it's truly scary how violent and irrational they can become. There really has to be some way we can compel people to take these medications because it really can make the difference between life and death.

Ticking Time-Bomb...

http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/bRuz/~3/236110280/2008_02_10_archive.html

I can't wait for him to freak out in a debate and completely ruin his campaign.

The Cover-Up is Worse Than the Crime...

http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/112-02152008-1488482.html

Man, this whole thing just keeps getting deeper and deeper. What a dysfunctional group of people.
I can only imagine the hurt that would have been prevented for all involved if the Church had just dealt with this problem years ago when it was starting instead of waiting until they were caught.

When the Media Becomes Just Another Party Organ...

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1713490,00.html

This shit could have been written by a McCain campaign flunky. This has been the preferred media narrative from the beginning. That McCain is some sort of superman beholden to the Republican Party but somehow warm and fuzzy and comfortable to Democrats. That even though they can't find a single bill of consequence where he voted against the Republicans, he's still a maverick who goes against his party. It's all a crock of bull.

McCain is as partisan as they come. In 2000 people felt sorry for him because of the way the party just chewed him up and spat him out, and because of this they entertained the notion that he was somehow different from all the other Republicans destroying our country. He was special, if he had just won that election somehow we'd be living in a wonderful land of bipartisan agreement and cross aisle love.

McCain has spent the last 8 years crawling so far up Dubya's ass that he could probably blow his nose for him by now. The lesson he learned from 2000 was that he should abandon all independence and become a mindless party hack so he can become President and unleash his horrible Manchurian design upon this unsuspecting nation. The media ignores all this though in the service of their favorite candidate. I hope we can come to realize that he isn't this wonderful "maverick" candidate we've all been waiting for (he's not even as good as he was in 2000 since that ordeal damaged his psyche in ways I'd imagine we'll never fully know). If we don't, we may end up falling for the same trick we fell for in 2000 when we elected George "compassionate conservative" Bush.

who is widely regarded (everywhere except inside the Republican Party itself) as honest, courageous, likable and intelligent.

I've never heard anyone call him these things other than Republican party flacks and nightly news anchors (and Joe Lieberman but he fits into the category of Republican Party flacks).

There is a word for it when a political party chooses a presidential candidate with more appeal in the opposition party than in his own.

There is no proof that he enjoys widespread popularity in the Democratic Party. Unless Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are pulling unprecedented amounts of Republicans across party lines, the poll numbers tend to suggest he's not getting many Dems at all other than Lieberman and the Blue Dog Traitors.

Only a couple of years ago, there were noises that McCain might admit he was much too nice to be a Republican and might run for President as an independent--or even as a Democrat.

That possibility existed solely within the Beltway and the depraved minds of the moronic Washington media elite. That would have been a case of the Democratic Party surrendering and running a Republican in order to win.

Democrats swooned and said they would vote for McCain because he was "honest."

That never happened. In 2000 he was floated as being better than Bush (which is like saying Mussolini is better than Hitler) and was perceived as a more palatable alternative. That doesn't mean Dems are going to jump ship in droves to vote for an emotionally destroyed quasi-corpse just because he seems like their old, crazy Grandpa. It certainly didn't happen "a couple of years ago". A couple of years ago we were kicking the Republicans asses up one side and down the other in the '06 elections.

McCain is perceived as authentic, which is a deeper form of honesty than mere truth-telling.

Only to beltway media elites, Bush was "authentic" to them too. That's another word for Republican in their book so they can paint Dems as effeminate fakes.

He says he's antiabortion? Oh, he doesn't mean that.

That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

Among current or recent figures in American public life, only Colin Powell shares McCain's mystical ability to make liberals believe he secretly agrees with them, no matter what he actually says.

I feel bad for Colin Powell since he was hung out to dry by the neo-con elements in his party. I still wouldn't vote for him for President, Secretary of Defense maybe if he changes parties, but not President.

Then they choose the very guy many Republicans most suspect of being a witch.

That's funny since he's been the heir apparent for the better part of the last four years since he proved himself trustworthy by giving up all his convictions and endorsing Bush in '04.

If you doubt that the whole thing was staged, just consider who the runner-up was. How could a party truly dedicated to self-destruction through ideological purity end up with the choice of McCain or Romney?

The Republican establishment has always been interested in victory at all costs much more than ideological purity. They pay lip service to the ideological morons because they're the ones who man the trenches but they secretly make fun of them at their tea parties in Georgetown.

But the parallel stops there. McCain is widely admired among Democrats, and many Democratic Hillary haters will be happy to vote for him. By contrast, there is no constituency for Hillary among Republicans who can't stand McCain. Nor, for that matter, will many of them vote for Barack Obama.

Bullshit. Is this guy Joe Lieberman's press secretary? As I said before, unless the polls are lying, there just aren't that many Dems running to Papa McCain. A lot of the most loyal Republicans are very unhappy with their party's choice. Many of them could vote for Hillary as a protest (as Ann Coulter has half-heartedly suggested) or more likely they'll just not vote. Anyone who can stand there after the showing that Obama has made among independents and Republicans and say that no Republicans will cross for him in November is an idiot.

If it's Hillary, people's growing dislike of Bush, his horrible war, his crumbling economy, his tiresome smirk, will help McCain. Even though McCain is the candidate of the President's party and even though he is the biggest supporter of the Iraq war outside of the Administration, McCain is the one who will seem like a new broom that sweeps clean.

This is what passes for journalism in Washington. Hillary will suffer for making a few pro-war votes because she's tied to the war in people's minds (by people's, he means the people he meets at cocktail parties in Washington). Meanwhile, McCain (the most vocal and enthusiastic cheerleader for Bush's disastrous war) is somehow completely untarnished by his 5 years of ass kissing and will be seen as a fresh start even though he wants us to be there forever (he's said up to 10,000 years).

Hillary, meanwhile, has been transformed by the Washington press corps in the past few weeks from the first woman with a serious chance of becoming President into a two-headed monster always referred to as "the Clintons."

That's not her fault, the Washington press corps is a bunch of self-important morons who really love the Republican Party.

If McCain were half the principled gentleman he pretends to be, he would drop out now in favor of Rush Limbaugh. Now there's a Republican you can sink your teeth into.

I can only imagine the impassioned missives that Michael and his buddies would be writing right now if Limbaugh was the Republican candidate. I think it would look a lot like what he wrote about McCain, but with McCain's name replaced with Rush Limbaugh's name. In the end, this was the same narrative they set up about Bush v. Gore (Bush is an authentic "compassionate conservative" who goes against his party when he needs to and Gore is a fake, girly man). This is the same narrative they'd set up about any Republican. Believe it at your own, and our country's own, peril.

Chelsea wants it both ways...

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/15/chelsea.clinton/index.html

The Clinton campaign cannot have it both ways here. When she was a child, I think the media should have left her alone. Now that she's acting as a surrogate on the campaign trail there's no reason she should be afforded any special deference at all. She has placed herself out there in the public eye as a part of her mother's campaign and she should have to talk to the media.